Skip to main content

Capital mobilization

Local Currency Capital and the Pension Pools Behind It

The answer to currency mismatch is local-currency debt. The obstacle is not appetite — domestic pension and insurance capital is substantial — but the rules and instruments that stand between it and infrastructure.

January 27, 2026 · 5 min read

By Consultinghouse GWB · Capital Mobilization & Structuring practice

01

Capital that is already there

Several African markets have accumulated substantial domestic institutional capital — pension funds, insurers, and asset managers holding assets in local currency with long-dated liabilities. On paper this is the natural match for infrastructure: local currency, long horizon, and a need for yield.

In practice the allocation to infrastructure remains small. The reasons are structural rather than a lack of interest.

02

What stands in the way

Prudential limits. Regulations typically cap allocations to unlisted and alternative assets. Where a limit is expressed narrowly, a project financing may not fit any permitted category even when the risk would be acceptable.

Instrument form. Many funds can hold listed debt more easily than unlisted loans. A project financed through a bilateral loan is invisible to them; the same risk in a listed bond or note may be investable.

Credit assessment capacity. Assessing a project financing requires specialist analysis. Funds without that capacity in-house default to government securities, which require none.

Tenor mismatch in the other direction. Some funds face redemption profiles that make very long assets uncomfortable despite long-dated liabilities on paper.

03

Structures that reach it

Listed project bonds and notes. Converting the exposure into a listed instrument solves the form problem and can solve the prudential one.

Credit enhancement. A partial guarantee that lifts an instrument into an investment-grade domestic rating can bring it inside mandate limits that the unenhanced instrument fails.

Pooled vehicles. Infrastructure debt funds aggregate assets and provide the credit assessment capability individual funds lack, with the fund itself sitting in a permitted category.

Take-out structures. Banks or development institutions finance construction, then sell down to domestic institutions once the asset is operating and the risk is one they can assess.

04

What sponsors should do

  • Establish early whether domestic institutions can hold the instrument as designed
  • If not, ask what form they could hold — listing, rating, enhancement
  • Engage regulators where a category genuinely does not exist; several have adapted
  • Size realistically: domestic markets absorb meaningful amounts, not unlimited ones
  • Treat the domestic tranche as a structuring objective from the start, not a late addition

Reaching domestic capital does more than close a financing. It reduces the currency exposure that ends projects, and it deepens a market that the next project will need.

Capital mobilization

Related insights

Risk advisoryMarch 3, 2026

Currency Mismatch: The Risk That Decides African Financings

Credit enhancementFebruary 24, 2026

When the Offtaker Is a State Utility

Capital mobilizationFebruary 17, 2026

Blended Finance and the Additionality Test

Back to insights